<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techbusiness.com.au &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techbusiness.com.au/category/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techbusiness.com.au</link>
	<description>KEYWORDS: technology - business - research - online surveys - Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who owns your Twitter updates?</title>
		<link>http://techbusiness.com.au/who-owns-your-twitter-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://techbusiness.com.au/who-owns-your-twitter-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romeo Cayabyab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techbusiness.com.au/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://techbusiness.com.au/who-owns-your-twitter-updates/" title="Permanent link to Who owns your Twitter updates?"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://techbusiness.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tweet-it.png" width="150" height="125" alt="Post image for Who owns your Twitter updates?" /></a>
</p><p>Last September, there was this commotion at Twitterland brought about by changes in Twitter&#8217;s Terms of Service (TOS).</p>
<p>As we saw it, the issue mainly revolved around ownership of&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://techbusiness.com.au/who-owns-your-twitter-updates/" title="Permanent link to Who owns your Twitter updates?"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://techbusiness.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tweet-it.png" width="150" height="125" alt="Post image for Who owns your Twitter updates?" /></a>
</p><p>Last September, there was this commotion at Twitterland brought about by changes in Twitter&#8217;s Terms of Service (TOS).</p>
<p>As we saw it, the issue mainly revolved around ownership of users&#8217; tweets. </p>
<p>One criticism hurled at Twitter was something like:</p>
<blockquote><p>If Twitter can do what they want with &#8216;our&#8217; tweets, including reproduction for their own (financial) gain, what do we actually &#8216;own&#8217;?&#8221;&#8230; &#8220;If Twitter loses our data, closes our accounts or goes out of business, do we still own those tweets? Or are they retrievable in any way?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Our  was that, although the Twitter-ers retain copyright to their tweets (or updates), Twitter is justified in claiming re-publication or reproduction rights to the content. This is a standard practice among publishing websites.</p>
<p>Recently, we had another look at this issue to find out if there were any major changes or modifications to the TOS on account of the concerns raised by Twitter-ers.</p>
<p>That TOS version which was &#8220;questioned&#8221; by Twitter-ers is now archived as version 2. The replacement, and the current, version was made effective September 18, 2009.</p>
<p>Being long documents, we had difficulty comparing the two sets of TOS. At the end, we concluded that there are no major differences between the two documents.</p>
<p>We also checked the Twitter&#8217;s blog section. Was there a blog entry subsequent to the TOS 10 September 2009 which perhaps could give us an idea of any changes made? </p>
<p>We could not find any. So, that&#8217;s it. If ever the current version contains statements different from the TOS of 10 September 2009, we could only assume that the changes were not earth-shattering to warrant another blog entry or new announcement.</p>
<p>The position of Twitter as to its claim to having reproduction rights of the users&#8217; tweets remains enshrined in the TOS.</p>
<p>*** The links to references in this entry may be found at  (10 September 2001 TOS),  (19 September 2009 and current version), and  (Twitter&#8217;s blog section).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techbusiness.com.au/who-owns-your-twitter-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
